Jump to content

Midland/GBSR Trails closed


soupkids

Recommended Posts

WTF !!!

 

 

Public Notice
Important Notification for Snowmobilers
Date: December 20, 2019
Please be advised that, due to issues beyond the control of the Town of Midland, the 
sanctioned snowmobile trails that are managed and maintained by Georgian Bay Snow Riders 
are closed for OFSC/GBSR use until further notice.
With the trails closed, access and use for snowmobiling is prohibited, as there will be no 
grooming, maintenance or trail supervision. The Town is committed to continue working with 
the Clubs to open the trails as soon as possible.
For any questions, please contact Georgian Bay Snow Riders:
Phone: 705-529-3307
Email: gbsr77@gmail.com 
Website: www.georgianbaysnowriders.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This seems to be a widespread problem at the moment and will result in many multi-use trails remaining closed this winter.

 

It seems the OFSC's insurance company has requested some changes to land use agreements,. These changes are not palatable to landowners such as towns and conservation authorities. 

 

Can someone shed some light on what the issue is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, coolbane said:

This seems to be a widespread problem at the moment and will result in many multi-use trails remaining closed this winter.

 

It seems the OFSC's insurance company has requested some changes to land use agreements,. These changes are not palatable to landowners such as towns and conservation authorities. 

 

Can someone shed some light on what the issue is?

 The OFSC insurance is ONLY insuring snowmobile use not supplying free insurance for non OFSC users such as hikers and skiers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wildbill said:

 The OFSC insurance is ONLY insuring snowmobile use not supplying free insurance for non OFSC users such as hikers and skiers. 

What? Tree hugging freeloaders can't pony up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wildbill said:

 The OFSC insurance is ONLY insuring snowmobile use not supplying free insurance for non OFSC users such as hikers and skiers. 

I was going to ask you Bill what is the status of the Seguin ?  I was wondering if there will be issues 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wildbill said:

 The OFSC insurance is ONLY insuring snowmobile use not supplying free insurance for non OFSC users such as hikers and skiers. 

This is nothing new.  It's a touch more involved than that I suspect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great! Can’t sled from home this year, now midland as well?? Ffs...

just lost 250kms of trail around home..

Edited by Baylaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they’re shutting down all of them, that’s a big chunk of trail system gone! 

54E3D466-15A7-44F6-953B-2F7455893F82.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Wildbill said:

 The OFSC insurance is ONLY insuring snowmobile use not supplying free insurance for non OFSC users such as hikers and skiers. 

As it should be but undoubtedly is of major concern to many Landowners who thought/or were told that they would be covered for persons coming onto their land to use trails in other manners than official OFSC Trail Permits.

 

In this new instances it certainly looks like various Conservation Authorities and similar agencies who allow their trail system to be utilized by OFSC Trails wanted blanket 12 month liability coverage but OFSC Insurer likely made it clear that OFSC can’t sign LUP’s requiring insurance coverage that may include non-OFSC use.

 

only question is to when this was made know to the various parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Baylaker said:

If they’re shutting down all of them, that’s a big chunk of trail system gone! 

54E3D466-15A7-44F6-953B-2F7455893F82.png

Obviously there is a lot more to this decision that an isolated property owner problem.  We will stay tuned but hopefully this is not the start of something  that may be permanent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, bbakernbay said:

Obviously there is a lot more to this decision that an isolated property owner problem.  We will stay tuned but hopefully this is not the start of something  that may be permanent.

I hope not, I really don’t want to get out of the sport, but if there’s major trail losses that continue to happen I may just sell both sleds. There’s still a lot of very good trails to ride on. But it definitely has me thinking after losing 250kms at home, and now GBSR are shutting down until further notice...which is some very good riding around my dads cottage. It just makes you wonder sometimes if this sport in Ontario is heading down the tube. It’s very frustrating...

Edited by Baylaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the feeling as we had alot of trails closed in 2016 around the Bracebridge area for the complete season due to landowners concern over proposed laws. I ended up getting a trailer and driving north just to run my new sled. Big issues like this usually get resolved if we pressure local goverment folk , let them now at every opportunity how pissed off you are that conservation area's (which are owned by the people) can't be used by the OFSC. I agree with the OFSC not having to pay a full years insurance. Perhaps if you are out snowmobiling on trail 55 drop by Doug Ford's place place on fawn lake and let him know the problem that cut backs are causing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Baylaker said:

If they’re shutting down all of them, that’s a big chunk of trail system gone! 

54E3D466-15A7-44F6-953B-2F7455893F82.png

Is the whole area you show on the map part of the Town of Midland? If it is, it's a huge loss of trail. The way I read it sounded like it was only  Club trails within the Town of Midland that were affected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Midland doesn't show up on the map. It's near Little Lake. LOL 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Muskoka Bill said:

I know the feeling as we had alot of trails closed in 2016 around the Bracebridge area for the complete season due to landowners concern over proposed laws. I ended up getting a trailer and driving north just to run my new sled. Big issues like this usually get resolved if we pressure local goverment folk , let them now at every opportunity how pissed off you are that conservation area's (which are owned by the people) can't be used by the OFSC. I agree with the OFSC not having to pay a full years insurance. Perhaps if you are out snowmobiling on trail 55 drop by Doug Ford's place place on fawn lake and let him know the problem that cut backs are causing.

It is not the government it is the insurance companies and lawsuits that are causing the problems. For a fact the biggest cutbacks ever to the trail system were by the last Liberal governments. Dougy has actually increased funding. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Wildbill said:

It is not the government it is the insurance companies and lawsuits that are causing the problems. For a fact the biggest cutbacks ever to the trail system were by the last Liberal governments. Dougy has actually increased funding. 

Thanks WildBill, Sorry for spewing garbage and not knowing the facts 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PISTON LAKE CRUISER said:
3 hours ago, Baylaker said:

 

Is the whole area you show on the map part of the Town of Midland?

The c trail is the main trunk and is a multi use trail. Lose that and pretty much nothing connects. A lot of trails are also simcoe county forest, don't know if they suffer the same issue. Now you would have to go down a bit south if coming from wasaga area if you want to head over to orillia or parry sound. Not only that but I bet theres a lot of buyers from penetang/Midland that will no longer buy. Hell I'm in wasaga and would be on the fence if those trails were done for good.

Edited by Poo Man
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Poo Man said:

The c trail is the main trunk and is a multi use trail. Lose that and pretty much nothing connects. A lot of trails are also simcoe county forest, don't know if they suffer the same issue. Now you would have to go down a bit south if coming from wasaga area if you want to head over to orillia or parry sound. Not only that but I bet theres a lot of buyers from penetang/Midland that will no longer buy. Hell I'm in wasaga and would be on the fence if those trails were done for good.

I understand what you are saying BUT as I mentioned in my previous post, the first post speaks only about the Town of Midland NOT Penetang or the areas to the south like Wyevale or Waverley. The town of Midland doesn't cover that much physical area from what I can see and only the section of the C trail actually in Midland is lost if I'm reading it right. 303 , 309 and other parts of the C trail do provide a bypass of The Town of Midland. Whatever happens sledders and businesses are taking the loss in Midland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If GBSR  are not grooming their trails, then all of those trails on that  picture I posted would not be maintained this year. This is how I read it in the OP, but I could be reading it wrong.

Edited by Baylaker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, PISTON LAKE CRUISER said:

I understand what you are saying BUT as I mentioned in my previous post, the first post speaks only about the Town of Midland NOT Penetang or the areas to the south like Wyevale or Waverley. The town of Midland doesn't cover that much physical area from what I can see and only the section of the C trail actually in Midland is lost if I'm reading it right. 303 , 309 and other parts of the C trail do provide a bypass of The Town of Midland. Whatever happens sledders and businesses are taking the loss in Midland. 

I hope you are right and this would be just a very small section being affected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Baylaker said:

I hope you are right and this would be just a very small section being affected.

If it was all their trails why would the statement say "due to issues beyond the control of the Town of Midland"? The town of Midland would have no say over the largest portion of the GBSR trails. JMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PISTON LAKE CRUISER said:

If it was all their trails why would the statement say "due to issues beyond the control of the Town of Midland"? The town of Midland would have no say over the largest portion of the GBSR trails. JMHO

Good point, and like I say, I hope your right! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Baylaker said:

If they’re shutting down all of them, that’s a big chunk of trail system gone! 

54E3D466-15A7-44F6-953B-2F7455893F82.png

How can the town of Midland close trails that aren't in the boundary of Midland 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...