Welcome to Ontario Conditions

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

gator

Members
  • Content count

    89
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Community Reputation

28 Excellent

About gator

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Location
    Muskoka
  • Main Riding Area
    Muskoka
  • Club
    Snowcrest
  • Sled
    2014 Ski Doo GSX LE 900 ACE
  • 13/14 Mileage
    3350 km
  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. As Blake says it may not be wise to cross highway 11. You may want to look into Hart of Muskoka, they are on Winhara Road just south of 118. They are right on the trail and are a supporter of the local club.
  2. I have a Garmin Nuvi 550 (Auto/marine no longer available) with a RAM mount attached to the extended glove box door. Map is from TrakMaps.
  3. Get a RAM mount that works with your model.
  4. Box 987, 67 Armstrong St. Bracebridge, ON P1L 1V2 P: 705-645-3123 | F: 705-645-3451 September 15, 2016 OPEN LETTER TO OFSC MEMBERS OFSC District 7 Muskoka would like to emphasize to the OFSC Board of Governors that our members are not against change. We, the volunteers of the District 7 board wish to make it clear again our unanimous opposition to the proposed District realignment and its associated costs as contained in the More on the Snow proposal for AGM 2016. Our dedicated core volunteers have been expected to shoulder ever increasing responsibilities with shrinking operational revenue each year, this is not a task that we are prepared to undertake. The District 7 board and other Districts have, on several occasions in writing to the OFSC President Remi Sauvé, voiced their concerns regarding the proposed re-alignment and aggressive timelines for the changes contained in the AGM 2016 information to membership. In his response to District concerns Mr. Sauvé stated the key reasons for the re-alignment of districts is to secure sustainability and stability for the future of the organization. This is a concern for District 7 which currently returns more than 50% of its gross permit revenues to the provincial organization for program management and redistribution to the Equalization Fund. This district is one of the most stable and sustainable entities, with paid annual permit sales in excess of 6700 units, and can stand on its own. If this district is unstable or unsustainable it is only because of an imbalance in the funding formula. Since the implementation of Framework for Change, District 7 has diligently been working on reducing expenditures within its control, administration costs, grooming, equipment maintenance and trail expenses have been under constant scrutiny. We have through the efforts of our members cut costs by tens of thousands of dollars each year which makes the district even more stable from a purely financial perspective. Can we do better, absolutely, but not under this new proposal for realignment and merging of District 7 and 10. The District 7 board believes that realignment is counterproductive and does not enhance grooming operations nor put More on the Snow for either Districts 7 or 10. We ask that the proposed merger of 7 and 10 be deferred for at least one year pending the implementation of the other components contained within the AGM 2016 package. SCORECARD MOTS 2015 - The key priorities of the strategic plan were: 1. Increase overall participation in organized snowmobiling by at least 6% to 100,000 paid permits – PASS/FAIL 2. Develop and commence implementation of a new organizational structure that: a. Reduces the number of layers of accountability (permit revenue) to two – PASS/FAIL b. Reduce the need for local clubs to be standalone NFP corporations – PASS/FAIL 3. Consistent with the new organizational structure, develop: a. A Groomer Fleet Asset Management Program and – PASS/FAIL Box 987, 67 Armstrong St. Bracebridge, ON P1L 1V2 P: 705-645-3123 | F: 705-645-3451 b. A Groomer Fleet Operational Management Program – PASS/FAIL 4. Continue to pursue long-term government support programs to generate at least $5 million per year – PASS/FAIL The lack of progress on the priorities set out for the BOG in 2016 should cause the membership to question why? Now, a year later, the priorities have not been successfully achieved or implemented; we are now as volunteers expected to engage in an entirely new set of priorities with a totally different focus!! At AGM 2015 we were directed to become a single permit selling entity in order to comply with one of the components of FFC and year one of MOTS. District 7 began working toward the integration of our 11 clubs, but without any guiding policies or procedures it proved to be a difficult path. Districts 7, as well as several other districts are concerned over the timelines and monumental volunteer time that will be required to complete what is being mandated in the 2016 – 2017 proposals. This is cause for great concern to the district and its board. District 7 has lost all confidence and credibility of the OFSC due to yearly program changes and lack of transparency. Volunteers are the backbone of this organization and a rapid implementation will wear them down, resulting in more resignations, bitterness, and infighting. The budget for MOTS is unclear and numbers need to be worked out and more importantly communicated to the volunteers. Only by implementing our following concerns, will District 7 accept MOTS 2016 and keep D7 viable:  Comprehensive Business Plan and Groomer Fleet Management Program  District Centralization and Trail Rationalization before any consideration of District Realignment  Reasonable timelines  Total transparent accountability
  5. I am against MOTS as it has been presented. That does not mean that I am against change; but there has to be a good plan in place backed up by lots of good data that supports the direction proposed by the plan. That is completely lacking in MOTS as presented by the OFSC. The OFSC could not plan itself out of a wet paper bag with a big tear in it. Bigger (as in amalgamating districts and having districts responsible for all aspects of snowmobiling) is not necessarily better. It is too easy to forget why you are there (good local trails and local support) in a bigger organization. Many amalgamated municipalities are now looking at leaving the larger organization as local issues are not being addressed. Lets make sure that we do not throw out the baby with the bath water. The OFSC must present the members with a detailed plan with sufficient financial and organizational data to support their proposal and it must have a realistic implementation schedule. Only with full information can the members make a proper educated decision. Without it we are rolling the dice and hoping that things work out.
  6. What a terrible erroneous comparison. It ain't over yet and when it is and if MOTS passes it is completely up to the volunteer if they want to continue or not and it is certainly not selfish for them to decide they cannot work in such an environment.
  7. Why do you think that the BOG delivered more detail? To me they have not provided any details and there is no justification either volunteer or financial wise that would convince any one to take this leap of faith. There are also no milestones that can be measured against to know that things are progressing to the desired end. The OFSC and BOG are doing what they do best: a complete lack of planning and when asked to come back with more details they introduce a completely new wrinkle (amalgamation) into the discussion. And the implementation schedule is unrealistic.
  8. This is the first time I've seen a Cat owner admit that a Cat can never make it back to its starting point....
  9. One thing I am sure of is that the OFSC does not listen to its membership. I have seen many motions submitted by the floor that are passed by a wide margin that are never implemented. If an OFSC motion is voted down you can be sure it will show up again at the next AGM. The wording may be changed with some goodies added to get the membership to vote for it (This is what's happening with the changes that will be made to MOTS). What is being submitted may be a good plan but there are too many unknowns and not nearly enough time to properly evaluate it. I don't trust the OFSC to do what is best for snowmobiling and its member clubs. There are no valid reasons for it to be an "all or nothing" vote once again. The way the OFSC operates reminds me of the Quebec independence votes. A No vote is never the end, it just keeps coming back, but once they receive a Yes vote it is over and done with, there is no going back.
  10. The samples will be at the golf tournament on Friday as well.
  11. Snowcrest Riders is pleased to announce the availability of customized clothing. Donations to the club can get you a great piece of clothing customized with the name of your favourite club on it. Take a look at the attached file that will give you complete details on the clothing and how you can donate to get the clothing of your choice. SnowcrestClothingForms-RevisedApril202015.pdf
  12. Leatherdale in Orillia. Great sales and service.
  13. Don't worry about slowing us down. We all had a good time and its good to see a young sledder coming along and enjoying the sport.